Criminal Checks News

Discovering someone's criminal history can be really helpful. Running a criminal background investigation is critical in the present society, because it can often help you identify if an individual is a respectable and fair individual. Companies can use criminal background probes to determine if they're going to hire somebody or not and it could also be utilized as a screening process for renters. What's more, if you're preparing to hire a new nanny, then you have to be certain you're leaving your children in safe hands. ‘John Doe’ When you get the results, you're going to need to go thru each listing and make note of any court records or arrest warrants issued. One way is generally to visit the governing body office where the individual lives and access the records found there. This may be awfully long, but hey you get a background investigation on somebody freely. You're going to need to make sure you check each listing, or else you will miss some of the background probe. If you don't find anything handy then you are going to need to try typing the name in numerous formats e.g.

A more acceptable alternative solution for your background investigation operation is to utilise the web facilities of independent firms that maintain large database of pubic records including the files required for your lookup, like the ones discussed above. This option may need some minimum investment from your end, but the standard of the results and the convenience it offers are worth way more than the small amount you paid for it. Actually, just select which among these selections is best. If you want free background investigation, then go forward and do it, if it doesn't give you the required result, you know your next option.

Because of the accelerating crime rate, there's a growing need for record checks. Not to way back, the sole available option will be to hire a personal investigator. The very good news is that running a background probe is less complicated than it once was. Luckily, today you can get criminal records with the press of a button. As an example, if you're a single lady who just met a person, you have to make sure he is not some sort of criminal and he isn't just lying about not being married.

One way is usually to visit the govt. office where the individual lives and access the records found there. Another rather unrealistic option is to hire a personal investigator on the web. This option is costly, considering the proven fact that there are always free online resources that can be utilized to find public documentation. To run a background probe for free you can peruse 1 or 2 govt internet sites, like sites of Fed. agencies where you'll find many alternative official records. As discussed above, this is an highly long technique, and you have to understand the sites Google indexed might not have been updated lately, or if they have, then Google may not have indexed the new info yet. This indicates that the data you gather with this strategy has a tendency to be superseded and wrong. But this is the sole real technique to get a background investigation on somebody absolutely free. If you're like the remainder of us and worth your time, then it may be worth spending the measly $20 or so to join a credible folk finder service like www.peoplefinder101.org that has great databases that get updated everyday. You enter the subject's name and all kinds of details can be retrieved.

These days you can make use of specialised net background info databases to find data on almost anyone. It is often galvanizing to see the quantity of data you can expose. You'll find out someone's address history, work records and complete background history with some clicks of your mouse. An improved alternative solution for your background probe operation is by using the net facilities of independent corporations that maintain big database of pubic records including the files required for your lookup, like the ones discussed above. This option may need some minimum investment from your end, but the standard of the results and the convenience it offers are worth way more than the small amount you paid for it. Actually, just select which among these decisions is best. If you want free background probe, then go forward and do it, if it doesn't give you the specified result, you know your next option.

In the wake of the last round of publicity surrounding employers asking job applicants for Facebook passwords, the US Senate is now getting involved.  We have seen various State bills introduced in the past few months, a Federal bill would likely preempt any State effort.  Is this a good idea or bad idea?  In my opinion, its a waste of time.  Facebook has already come out harshly against the practice and so have many in the background screening industry.  In the end its a terrible hiring practice, bad for candidates, bad for the candidate experience and bad PR for any company that attempts it. Why is it a waste of time? I don’t really think many companies are doing it.  We have seen story after story but can’t really find much evidence that companies are actually doing it!  So it really begs the question, would we support actions forbidding it, YES, of course.  However, I think the US Senate has way more important things to concentrate on right now!

Senate introduces Password Protection Act of 2012

Concerned with what they believe is “the growing practice of employers requiring prospective or current employees to provide access to password-protected accounts as a condition for employment,” Senators Richard Blumenthal, D-CT; Chuck Schumer, D-NY; Ron Wyden, D-OR; Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH; and Amy Klobuchar, D-MN, introduced the Password Protection Act of 2012 (PPA).

A press release from Sen. Blumenthal stresses that the PPA, which would amend the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, prohibits an employer from “forcing prospective or current employees to provide access to their own private account as a condition of employment and … from discriminating or retaliating against a prospective or current employee because that employee refuses to



We just published The Verifier XXV, Spring 2012 Edition, an educational and information resource for human resource professionals or anyone interested in keeping abreast of recent employment screening and background check industry developments.

Highlights Include:

• Tips for Employers Based on 2012 EmployeeScreenIQ Trends Survey
• Recorded Briefing on New EEOC Guidance on the Use of Criminal Records in Employment
• Case Study: Lighthouse Academies Safeguards Scholars With Comprehensive Background Checks
• BTW: Your Background Screening Guide to Staying Out of Hot Water
• Sweeping Changes Massachusetts CORI Background Checks
• EmployeeScreenIQ Earns “World Class Customer Service” Distinction

View Complete Newsletter

For those interested in subscribing to The Verifier, please click on the “Subscribe” button below.

Also, we invite you to check out our latest video on how EmployeeScreenIQ streamlines the background screening process from setting up an account to ordering background checks to reporting.

We wondered in this very blog just a week ago if Yahoo! CEO, Scott Thompson could maintain his post at the company after it was discovered that he lied about his academic qualifications.  Thompson claimed to have a degree in Accounting and Computer Science from Stone Hill College.  While he did have the Accounting degree, the school didn’t even offer a Computer Science degree until after he graduated.

As if we didn’t all know the outcome of this story, the Wall Street Journal has confirmed that Thompson stepped down over the weekend.  And as we here more and more about the details, this is looking very George O’Leary-ean.  Who can forget the Notre Dame head coach who lasted about 5 days on the job until it was reported that he lied about his educational background?

Just like O’ Leary, Thompson got caught up in a lie he started much earlier in his career.  The representation that he earned that Computer Science degree might have helped him get a leg up early on.  But from there, it was his experience that carried the day.  However, once you tell the resume  lie, you can’t stop telling it when you become well-known.

It seems Thompson tried to cover up his lie by, what else, lying.  Last week, he blamed the executive recruiting firm that helped place him at PayPal for the oversight.  Whoops!  He got caught in that one too.  The firm didn’t actually place him at Yahoo!

And so ends a familiar tale.  Applicant lies to get the job.  Employer doesn’t take the steps to confirm the applicant’s resume.  Both end of looking famously stupid.

Got Background Checks?

P.S. Today it is being reported that Thompson stepped down because he is battling thyroid cancer.  Let’s hope

Online background searches have streamlined the investigative process, no longer requiring a middle aged sleuth to hit the archetypal pavement for weeks at a time. Making the old-time PI in ditch coat, fedora and smoke filled room outdated, the criminal background probes online has become unremarkable. Info thru the web is gigantic, continued and available in place making conducting a criminal background search on the net better and the favored system of many . The sort of info found might or might not surprise you and isn't restricted to simply revealing deliberately forgotten criminality. A much better alternative solution for your background probe operation is by utilising the web facilities of independent corporations that maintain great database of pubic records including the files required for your lookup, like the ones discussed above. You may also access to such info at one or two courts.

This option may need some nominal investment from your end, but the standard of the results and the convenience it offers are worth way more than the small amount you paid for it. And anyway, just select which among these selections is best. If you actually want free background probe, then go forward and do it, if it doesn't give you the required result, you know your next option. As an example, if you're a single girl who just met a person, you've got to make sure he is not a sort of criminal and he isn't just lying about not being married. If you're an employer, then it'd be pleasant to be well placed to check out a possible worker.

Sadly , currently there isn't any across the nation database that contains records from all over the land, but you can still employ a few sites , for example The Fed. Bureau of Prison’s site and the Nation's Sex Predator Registry. Therefore how are you able to run a free criminal background investigation? You can go to a couple of free online criminal records databases. You'll find out someone's address history, work records and complete background history with just a couple of clicks of your mouse. The databases which you can conduct a search thru are developed by pro organisations specializing in this sort of service. The associations need to pay for this information, so clearly they charge a low charge for running a background search. Instead of being charged for every individual search, it is a sensible to utilise a corporation that charges a registration charge for unrestricted background searches.

‘John Doe’ When you get the results, you'll need to go thru each listing and make note of any court records or arrest warrants issued. Let us show you a fast trick you need to use to learn if it is possible to learn the same info at no charge. You're going to need to make sure you check each listing, or else you will miss some of the background investigation. You'll see on top right in accordance with the search bar in Google, you'll be given a considerable number of results – this is the quantity of pages you'll need to by hand check. If you don't find anything handy then you're going to need to try typing the name in varied formats e.g.



For those of you interested in keeping up with the latest in background screening compliance and the laws that affect your use of employments background checks, check out our latest publication, “BTW: Your Guide to Staying Out of Hot Water”. This compliance resource has been crafted by our VP of Compliance and General Counsel, Angela Bosworth and is a must-read for human resources and security professionals.

Our first issue is dedicated to the most recent guidelines issued by the EEOC.  We’ll endeavor to send out a new “BTW” once a month.

Check it out.

Background investigations have gotten to be part of our humdrum lives, and are performed by many individuals every day. It is easy to do a background probe on somebody completely for nothing. Go to one of the top search engines ,eg Google or Yahoo. Type the person’s name using quotes in the search box, e.g. ‘John Doe’ When you get the results, you'll need to go thru each listing and make note of any court records or arrest warrants issued. Whatever the purpose, conducting a criminal history checks online hasn't ever been simpler. Simply get online and find a service supplier, pay a one off charge and most frequently receive the info requested instantly.

You might have the data you seek inside 1 or 2 seconds. That way, if there's a mistake or inaccurate entry, you can file a disagreement straight before it ruins your reputation or closes opportunities due to an inaccurate entry. Therefore if you are short of information regarding somebody, you now know the info can be had in a fast, efficient and uneventful demeanour saving you time and doubtless supplying you with confidence. Internet-based dating sites are intensely favored nowadays. And while being a wonderful resource for folk to meet up with other folk, it's also of the greatest significance that you know the way to do a background probe and ensure that this person you are seeing isn't a convicted criminal or married or worse. You cannot show too much care and doing background probes online is convenient. If you're an employer, then it might be sweet to be in a position to check out a possible worker. If you're making preparations to hire a new child-minder, then I am sure that you would not desire somebody with a record of kid abuse or abducting to observe after your youngsters. Hence how are you able to run a free criminal background probe? You can go to one or two free online criminal records databases. You may use the dept of automobiles to discover if the individual has ever been arrested for impetuous driving.There are 1 or 2 more free services available, but the issue is that many of them only provide a general review and do not give any details of the person’s offences.

One way is generally to visit the govt office where the individual lives and access the records found there. It's vital to get as much info as you can, if you'd like to make the correct calls. Nevertheless this technique needs lots of time and effort, particularly if the records aren't found in your state. Another rather unreal option will be to hire a personal investigator on the internet. To run a background investigation for free you can read 1 or 2 govt sites, like sites of Fed. agencies where you'll find many alternative official documentation.

In October 2010, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) created stricter drug testing rules for employees of federally regulated employers that include lower cutoff levels for substances like amphetamines and cocaine. At the same time, the DOT added substances like ecstasy and heroin to the required drug testing list for transportation workers in public and private sectors.

As a result of these changes, individuals who had previously met the guidelines to pass a drug test while having consumed banned substances are now more likely to be identified. While the new rules have helped identify more individuals who abuse drugs, there are further steps that employers can take to detect drug use and enhance safety.

Positive Drug Tests on the Rise
While many transportation employees test negative for banned substances, a growing trend of positive test results continues. According to the 2011 Quest Diagnostics Drug Testing Index, there was a 33 percent increase in employees who tested positive for cocaine use since 2010, and a nearly 26 percent increase in employees who tested positive for amphetamines.

According to a March 2012 WebMD report, some transportation workers use illegal substances such as stimulants to help them stay awake and alert. However, some workers use prescribed amphetamines (like methylphenidate) for conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

However, researchers have noted that the increase in positives is likely attributed to the lowered cutoff levels that took effect in 2010.

Drug Testing Gaps Remain
As transportation employers know, safety is paramount, and employing drivers that do not abuse drugs is essential. Regulated employers that adhere to federal drug testing guidelines are taking steps to maintain a certain level of safety, but a drug testing gap may still exist. Different drug testing methods provide

Chalk this story up to something a background screening provider most likely will not do now or in the future: ethnicity testing.

Massachusetts Republican party leaders are calling for Harvard University to investigate faculty member and U.S. Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren for lying about her ethnicity.  Warren claimed that she was Native American which GOP leader Bob Maginn says is unsubstantiated.  And because he believes that she got her job with the university because of her ethnicity claims, he believes this is academic fraud.

Check out the full story reported by the Boston Herald.

State GOP big rips Liz claim, urges Harvard investigation

The head of the Massachusetts Republican Party yesterday demanded Harvard University investigate faculty member and U.S. Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren’s claim to be a Native American minority professor.

MassGOP Chairman Bob Maginn slammed Warren’s claim as baseless and mocked her statements in response to the controversy over the past week.

Maginn said Warren’s actions “appear to constitute academic fraud” and suggested Harvard consider disciplinary action.

“The problem is that Ms. Warren is not a Native American,” wrote Maginn, a Harvard alum. “She is Caucasian. Despite her insistence that she is an American Indian based upon ‘family lore’ and her observation that some in her family had ‘high cheekbones like all the Indians do,’ she has failed to produce a single shred of evidence to substantiate her claim.”

Maginn said Warren’s actions “potentially violate” Harvard’s academic standards and the university is obligated to probe the Democrat’s actions.

“By Harvard’s own Code and precedent, Ms. Warren’s actions require an investigation,” wrote Maginn.

Warren campaign officials referred to statements released last week by Harvard Law Professor Charles Fried, who sat on the panel that hired Warren in 1995, and former Harvard Law Dean Robert Clark.

Both defend Warren’s credentials as the primary reason